Skip to main content
Clean Best logo
Menu
Call 02 5839 30120485 000 860

Wentworthville NSW 2145

Waiting room overflow into a shared Wentworthville corridor

A practice puts three chairs in the corridor because its waiting room is full. Patients sit there, the corridor quietly becomes part of the waiting experience, and the area is common property that every owner in the building contributes to funding.

Request a fixed quote Call 02 5839 3012

In short

Where a Wentworthville practice extends its waiting area into a shared corridor, the corridor remains common property controlled by the owners corporation. Furniture placed there by a lot, and the additional use it generates, are matters for the committee under the scheme's own by-laws and records.

Clean Best scopes the corridor as common property and records what is placed in it rather than treating it as part of the practice. Where use has clearly increased, that is reported so the committee can consider it deliberately. Questions of permitted use are referred to the owners corporation rather than raised on site.

Whose chairs are those

Furniture placed on common property by an individual lot creates a genuine ambiguity. It is the practice's property, it is on the scheme's land, and it is being used by people who believe they are in the practice's waiting room. A cleaner cannot sensibly decide whether to clean around it, move it or treat it as part of the routine, and no scope should require that judgement.

The scope should state what is scheme property and what belongs to a lot, with anything else left in place and reported. The larger question of whether the furniture may be there at all is governed by the scheme's own by-laws and records, and it is a matter for the owners corporation and its strata managing agent rather than for a contractor to raise. The permission question and the cleaning question are entirely separate matters.

Increased use of an area nobody funded for it

A corridor scoped as circulation and used as a waiting area carries a completely different load. People sit, wait, eat, leave things behind and spend an hour there rather than walking through in seconds. The frequency set for a circulation route will visibly fail, and the failure will look like a service problem rather than the change of use that it is. The failure looks like poor service and is actually a change of use.

Reporting that change rather than absorbing it is what gives the committee a decision. It may decide to fund the higher frequency, or to address the underlying situation with the lot concerned, or to do nothing. All three are legitimate. What is not useful is the scheme quietly funding a higher level of service for one lot's overflow without anybody ever having discussed it. Silent absorption removes the committee's ability to decide anything.

Patients experience the corridor as the practice

From a patient's perspective there is no boundary at all. The corridor, the waiting room and the consulting room are one experience, and the practice is judged on all of it. That gives the practice a strong interest in an area it does not control and cannot instruct anybody about, which is a frustrating position to be in. It is a frustrating position and a very common one.

The route through is a written request to the committee with a specific proposal, which is far more likely to succeed than a general concern about presentation. Many committees are receptive once they understand that the practice's patients are forming a view of the whole building, not just of one suite, in an area the scheme is already funding. The area is already being funded by the scheme in any case.

Corridor overflow points for a Wentworthville building

  • Scheme furniture listed separately from lot property
  • Items belonging to a lot left in place and reported
  • Changed use of a circulation area reported to the committee
  • Frequency reviewed against actual use rather than layout
  • Questions of permitted use referred to the owners corporation
  • A written route for the practice to request more attention
Clean Best supervisor reviewing office and strata cleaning quality in Parramatta NSW

Working in Wentworthville and the Greater Parramatta

Wentworthville in Greater Parramatta carries healthcare, retail, offices and mixed-use premises, with strata buildings where consulting suites and small practices occupy lots along shared corridors. Practices of that kind frequently outgrow their waiting areas and extend into circulation space that belongs to the scheme rather than to them. The corridor is funded by every owner and controlled by the committee, while the people using it believe they are in a waiting room. Clean Best services Wentworthville from Seven Hills and scopes the corridor as common property.

Questions about Wentworthville

Can a practice put chairs in the shared corridor?

That is governed by the scheme's own by-laws and records and is a matter for the owners corporation and its strata managing agent rather than for a cleaning contractor. From a service perspective, furniture belonging to a lot is left in place and reported. The permission question belongs entirely with the scheme. A contractor should not be raising permission questions with any occupier.

Should the cleaning frequency increase for that corridor?

The use has changed substantially, so the existing frequency will visibly fail regardless of how carefully it is delivered. Whether the scheme funds a higher level is a committee decision. Reporting the change rather than absorbing it is what gives the committee the chance to decide rather than discovering it through complaints. Complaints are a considerably worse way for a committee to learn about it.

Will the cleaner move the chairs to clean underneath?

Not unless the scope provides for it, because the furniture belongs to a lot rather than to the scheme. The area is cleaned around it and the position is recorded. Requiring a contractor to move another party's property creates a risk nobody needs and a judgement they should not be making. Recording the position also protects the practice's property.

Our patients judge the corridor as part of the practice. What can we do?

Put a specific written request to the committee, ideally with a quoted option attached. Many committees are receptive once they understand that patients form a view of the whole building. A general concern about presentation is far less likely to produce a decision than a defined proposal with a cost. Committees respond to proposals rather than to concerns.

Who pays if the corridor needs more attention?

The owners corporation, since it is common property funded by all owners. Whether the scheme seeks any contribution from the lot generating the additional use is a matter for the committee with advice from its strata managing agent. What the cleaning arrangement provides is an accurate record of what changed. That record is what any later discussion would need to rely on.

Related pages

Get a fixed written quote for Wentworthville

Free walkthrough, scope in writing, price back within 24 hours.

Request a quote
Call nowEmail us