What is actually lost when a committee turns over
It is rarely the contract that disappears. What goes is everything around it: why the frequency was set where it is, which areas were deliberately excluded and why, what was tried before and did not work, and which owner had the ongoing concern about the rear stair. That context is what allows a committee to make sensible decisions rather than re-litigating settled questions. None of it is written anywhere, and none of it is obvious from the invoice.
The consequence is predictable. A new committee looks at a price with no scope attached, assumes it is high, seeks alternative quotes and compares them against nothing. Whichever provider produces the shortest number wins, the scope quietly shrinks, and two years later the scheme is dealing with the consequences of a decision nobody intended to make. By then the owner who understood the original reasoning has long since sold and moved on.
