Skip to main content
Clean Best logo
Menu
Call 02 5839 30120485 000 860

Crows Nest NSW 2065

Grease and odour crossing common property in Crows Nest mixed buildings

A kitchen's back door opens onto a corridor that everyone in the building uses. Waste, grease and odour travel that route several times a night, and the corridor is common property funded by owners who have nothing to do with the restaurant.

Request a fixed quote Call 02 5839 3012

In short

Where a hospitality tenancy in a Crows Nest building shares circulation with other lots, the corridor, service lift and bin route are usually common property. The soil arriving there is generated inside one lot, but the cost of dealing with it falls to the owners corporation by default.

Clean Best scopes the back-of-house route as its own item, with a method suited to grease rather than general foot traffic, and a reporting instruction so repeated problems reach the committee rather than being absorbed into the weekly attendance. Where the pattern is persistent, that record is what the committee needs before raising it with the lot concerned.

The route is the problem, not the room

Grease and food soil do not stay where they are generated. They travel on trolleys, on shoes and in bags along a defined route from a kitchen door to a bin room, and that route is almost always common property. Treating it with a general corridor method produces a surface that looks clean and remains slippery, which is a genuine risk in a service area.

Scoping the route specifically, with an appropriate method and a frequency matched to trading nights rather than to the working week, addresses the actual problem. It also makes the cost visible as a line the committee can see, which matters when the question of who is generating it eventually comes up at a meeting, as it invariably does. A method chosen for the actual soil costs no more than the wrong one and lasts considerably longer.

Odour is a building issue with a cleaning symptom

Complaints about odour in shared circulation usually arrive as cleaning complaints, because that is the service people can see. In most cases the cause is a ventilation issue, a grease trap arrangement, a door being propped or a waste room at capacity, none of which cleaning can fix and all of which belong to somebody else's budget. The cleaning contractor is simply the most visible party rather than the responsible one.

The useful response is to check the cleaning question quickly and then report the rest accurately. A contractor who records where and when odour was noticeable gives the owners corporation something to take to the tenant, the building manager or a ventilation contractor. Increasing cleaning frequency in response to an odour complaint almost always spends money without changing anything. It also protects the scheme from spending a year on the wrong remedy.

What the scheme absorbs and what it raises

Some transfer of soil from a hospitality lot into shared areas is ordinary and reasonably absorbed by the scheme, in the same way that foot traffic from any tenancy is. The question is where ordinary ends. A committee cannot answer that without knowing how often the route needs recovery work beyond its routine attendance. Without that, the committee is deciding on impressions formed by whoever complained most recently.

That is why reporting matters more than a slightly higher frequency. Where the record shows the route needs additional attention on most trading weekends, the committee has a factual basis for a conversation with the owner of that lot, guided by the scheme's own by-laws and whatever advice its strata managing agent gives. Without the record, the cost simply stays where it landed. The record is what turns an uncomfortable conversation into a manageable one.

Back-of-house points for a Crows Nest building

  • The kitchen-to-bin route scoped as its own item
  • A method suited to grease rather than general soil
  • Frequency matched to trading nights, not the working week
  • A record of recovery work beyond the routine attendance
  • Odour observations reported rather than treated as cleaning
  • A clear boundary at the tenancy's own back door
Clean Best supervisor reviewing office and strata cleaning quality in Parramatta NSW

Working in Crows Nest and the Lower North Shore

Crows Nest on the Lower North Shore carries hospitality, healthcare, retail and professional offices, with a dense main street where kitchens and food tenancies operate at ground level beneath offices and apartments. Buildings of that shape route all back-of-house movement through shared corridors, service lifts and bin rooms that belong to the owners corporation rather than to the business generating the traffic. The cost of that arrangement sits with every owner in the scheme. Clean Best services Crows Nest from Seven Hills and scopes the service route separately from general circulation.

Questions about Crows Nest

Should the restaurant pay more towards corridor cleaning?

Contributions normally follow unit entitlement, and any variation is a matter for the owners corporation with advice from its strata managing agent under the scheme's own records. Cleaning cannot decide it. What the service can provide is a record of how much recovery work the route needs beyond the routine, which is the factual basis such a discussion requires.

The corridor smells even after cleaning. What now?

That usually points to ventilation, a grease trap arrangement, a propped door or a waste room at capacity rather than to the cleaning itself. Increasing frequency spends money without addressing any of those. A record of where and when the odour is noticeable gives the owners corporation something concrete to take to the tenant or a specialist contractor.

Does the scheme's cleaner go inside the kitchen?

No. The inside of a hospitality tenancy is lot property and its cleaning is arranged and funded by that business under its own agreement. The common property scope stops at the tenancy door. The same contractor can hold both arrangements separately, which often helps because the boundary is then understood by everyone on site. That keeps the funding boundary clear between the business and the scheme.

Who deals with a spill on the way to the bins?

In practice it is cleaned promptly because it is a hazard on common property, and then recorded. Whether the cost sits with the scheme or is raised with the lot concerned is a committee matter rather than a cleaning one. What the contractor contributes is a note of what happened and when, so the pattern is visible if it recurs.

Can the bin route be cleaned after trading rather than in the morning?

It depends on the building's access arrangements and on whether late work would disturb residential or office occupiers above. Where late attendance is not possible, an early morning pass before the building fills up is usually the better option. Either way it is an owners corporation decision because the route is common property. The committee should make that call rather than the contractor choosing a time that suits the roster.

Related pages

Get a fixed written quote for Crows Nest

Free walkthrough, scope in writing, price back within 24 hours.

Request a quote
Call nowEmail us